Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Jweezy's Avatar
    Jweezy is offline J to da Weezy..Baby!!
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,249

    Increase our 5.7 compression Ratio.?

    Sup guys...

    It really BOTHERS the HELL out of me...all the neons, rsx, and GTO, mustangs, and a couple other CHUMP CARs...have higher compression ratio engines then we...DONT WE HAVE A HEMI...one of the best ever made...

    IT really bothers me, for the fact when the turboz come out, and other things, our compression ratio will affect how high we can go...

    An example is the Twin Turbo..we are fighting on gettin OVER 4 psi...SAFETLY...WTF...

    my friends EVO has 30-45 psi..

    and my friends srt-4 runs at 25 all the time...no issues, and DOESNT RUN HOTTER THAN OUR ENGINES...without a TURBO...

    SO my question is CAN WE INCREASE THIS...sorry if this is a stupid question? but it really pisses me off, that this mustang or this GTO you add a turbo or supercharger, and YOU HAVE CRAZY HORSEPOWER...with no issues...

    Jweezy

  2. #2
    Super T's Avatar
    Super T is offline Speed on... Hell ain't half full
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    24,675
    i'm not sure what the supercharger from gsm adds in terms of pounds of boost, but it's way over 4. They stopped at 4 with the turbo setup because they were ironing out the tuning. Problems in fuel or spark curves can be accentuated, and therefore more harmful, at higher compressions. Both of these setups can easily yield over 100 hp increase. I don't doubt our block could handle 20 psi boost, but it'd probably require high-yield head gaskets and it'd be smart to replace your crank and connecting rods before you got into that realm of power. Besides, not to burst the communal bubble, but the legendary hemi doesn't really have all that much more to offer than other 'high-performance' engines these days, other than a legendary namesake.


    I DRINK ROYAL PURPLE! WHAT NOW?!

    > 2006 Silver SRT-8 magnum, adopted 9/9/06 with 36 miles, groups I, II, &III.
    * tinted LED Tails * Mopar Remote Start * Stainless Airhammer * Coated Kooks Longtubes * PPP Heads, Cam, and Converter * Alpine R10 Subs/AoN Enclosures * 20" Black AR 311's w/ Nitto 420's * Corsa cat-back * Front Window Tint * Ratman Hatch Button Mod * Hotchkis Sways * BT Underhood Bling * Polished Intake Manifold * Autodim Drivers Mirror *

  3. #3
    iamkungfool is offline Bane of Zombiehood
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,861
    i thought the weak block was why they stopped boring it out for a 6.1? or was the boring what was causing them to go weak?

    i'm with jweezy on this. i mean i KNOW i have a 4400lb stationwagon...but i'd also really like to have 700hp and 850+ ft/lbs at the wheels pushing that monkey. if i have to replace all the internals to run 10lbs of boost...maybe i can deal with that. if there's no way to make the engine work with 10lbs of boost...i can't deal with that.

    it's my understanding morpheus will make all this a non-issue. maybe MF can chime in?
    Click here to Join the Great LX Weight-Off!
    Click here to Track the Progress!


    The leading authority on Anti-MTV ConsumerBotism.


    I'm a real estate agent let me know if i can help you!

  4. #4
    Black on Black's Avatar
    Black on Black is offline and there's no going back
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    846
    I believe the GSM boost is in the 8-10psi range. I don't think the main source of extra displacement for the 6.1 was additional bore, but extra stroke. That's length, not girth, gentlemen. Perhaps someone can correct me or tell the whole story.
    '05 Dodge Magnum R/T - Brilliant Black Pearlcoat - SOLD
    '05 Pontiac GTO - Cyclone Gray M6 - "CycloneLS2" at ls2gto.com

  5. #5
    done's Avatar
    done is online now Member for 7 years
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Old Hickory, TN
    Posts
    10,189
    Quote Originally Posted by iamkungfool
    i thought the weak block was why they stopped boring it out for a 6.1? or was the boring what was causing them to go weak?

    i'm with jweezy on this. i mean i KNOW i have a 4400lb stationwagon...but i'd also really like to have 700hp and 850+ ft/lbs at the wheels pushing that monkey. if i have to replace all the internals to run 10lbs of boost...maybe i can deal with that. if there's no way to make the engine work with 10lbs of boost...i can't deal with that.

    it's my understanding morpheus will make all this a non-issue. maybe MF can chime in?
    Well there is the "weak block" fairy tale again. I thought we killed that last year.

    http://www.watsoncard.com/magnum/ LMI True CAI, FRI Heads, Sidewinder, Shorties, High Flows, Catback, Throttle Body, Predator

  6. #6
    RobAGD's Avatar
    RobAGD is offline See ya in anotha life brotha

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Reston, Va
    Posts
    13,910
    Justin - A few things you need to understand about compression and Boost.

    Compression is the mechnical compression put on the air within the cylinder. So at Bottom Dead Center ( BDC ) you have lets say 1 cubic foot of air, and at Top Dead Center ( TDC ) that air is compressed to 1 cubic inch that is effectly 12:1 compression.

    Boost is the ammount of pressure that is put on the air into the engine. This packs more air into the cylinder. This will make power because it gets more air/fuel into the cylinder and by doing that your raising the pressure in the cylinder to higher levels making more power ( basically )

    Now, I would be willing to bet that those Evo's and Subies are running clost to 8:1 vs our 9.5 10:1 With a lower mechnical compression, and the boost your packing more air/fuel and making more power.

    With a higher mechnical compression ratio you can boost it to the sme levels BUT you will have more of a problem with detonation with out race gas, so the cure is running lower boost levels.

    All of this is also effectived by the cam and how much valve over lap is there. You can effect cylinder pressure but lower overlaps or longer to tune how things run.

    With our engines I wouldnt want to run lots of boost because of detonation problems with 93 octane fuels.

    -Robert

  7. #7
    CoolVanilla's Avatar
    CoolVanilla is offline The Dude Abides



    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,166
    Quote Originally Posted by RobAGD
    Justin - A few things you need to understand about compression and Boost.

    Compression is the mechanical compression put on the air within the cylinder. So at Bottom Dead Center ( BDC ) you have lets say 12 cubic inches of air, and at Top Dead Center ( TDC ) that air is compressed to 1 cubic inch that is effectively 12:1 compression.

    Boost is the amount of pressure that is put on the air into the engine. This packs more air into the cylinder. This will make power because it gets more air/fuel into the cylinder and by doing that your raising the pressure in the cylinder to higher levels making more power ( basically )

    Now, I would be willing to bet that those Evo's and Subies are running close to 8:1 vs our 9.5 10:1 With a lower mechanical compression, and the boost your packing more air/fuel and making more power.

    With a higher mechanical compression ratio you can boost it to the same levels BUT you will have more of a problem with detonation with out race gas, so the cure is running lower boost levels.

    All of this is also effected by the cam and how much valve over lap is there. You can effect cylinder pressure but lower overlaps or longer to tune how things run.

    With our engines I wouldn't want to run lots of boost because of detonation problems with 93 octane fuels.

    -Robert
    That belongs in the Knowledge Base.
    Last edited by CoolVanilla; 07-31-2006 at 07:16 PM.

  8. #8
    MomsR/T's Avatar
    MomsR/T is offline Builders of the 500rwhp 426's
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    5,341
    Exactly...........

    I remember years ago I was "keeping up with the Jones".....

    Someone else would go fast, so I would try and go faster..........it never ends.

    You'll find you need to have expectations and build a car to THOSE. If the sky is the limit then I think you just answered your own question.

    If you want a ton of boost, then you need to LOWER your mech compression..........if you want mech compression you need to lower your boost.

    The SRT motors run (i think) 10.5:1 while we 5.7-guys are running 9.5:1.

    My combo, if we get this tuning thing figured out, will be to run around 10.25 - 10.5:1 in a 5.7 with a little N20.

    As I spray, it will bump up the compression to maybe around 12:1 due to the expansion and density of the N20.........

    We control this with "cooler" plugs (as do turbo and blower guys), drop timing, and up octane.

    Its not a "one thing fixes all" issue............

    More timing = more HP
    Too much timing = detonation
    More compression = more HP
    too much compression = detonation
    Hot plugs = good burn = HP
    Too hot = detonation
    Smaller LSA = up the power in the RPM
    More LSA = lowers the power in the RPM
    More lift = volume flow increase (cfm)
    Too much lift = volume flow decrease (psi - speed)

    ****(these are layman examples and a generalities ONLY)

    You'll find, as you get into "cars" is that its all about the COMBO and not really about "bigger is better".

    You may find that a 5.7 with 10:1 (or so) with 4 PSI of boost and a small 25 shot of N20 runs all over a 2.0 - 2.5 litre running 25 lbs of boost @ 8:1.
    Last edited by MomsR/T; 07-31-2006 at 07:10 PM.

  9. #9
    DawsonMagnum's Avatar
    DawsonMagnum is offline Wielder of Mjolnir!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Duluth, GA
    Posts
    3,087
    Quote Originally Posted by RobAGD
    Compression is the mechnical compression put on the air within the cylinder. So at Bottom Dead Center ( BDC ) you have lets say 1 cubic foot of air, and at Top Dead Center ( TDC ) that air is compressed to 1 cubic inch that is effectly 12:1 compression.
    If I may inject something...there's a math error here. 1 cubic foot = 1728 cubic inches (12" x 12" x 12"). So compressing 1 cubic foot down to 1 cubic inch would be a compression ration of 1728:1. I guess you meant to say 12 cubic inches instead of 1 cubic foot?
    Alis volat propiis.

    Glenn Harper - 2006 Brilliant Black Magnum SRT8
    Mods: FRI Fatman Cam, FRI Full Street Heads, Coated Intake Manifold, Coated Kooks LT Headers & hiflo Cats, B&G Stage II, Corsa Catback, 170 TStat. Various BT interior items & Custom Console Cover by Jina!

  10. #10
    iamkungfool is offline Bane of Zombiehood
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,861
    Quote Originally Posted by DawsonMagnum
    If I may inject something...there's a math error here. 1 cubic foot = 1728 cubic inches (12" x 12" x 12"). So compressing 1 cubic foot down to 1 cubic inch would be a compression ration of 1728:1. I guess you meant to say 12 cubic inches instead of 1 cubic foot?
    lol i was gonna say that.

    but otherwise you're spot on
    Click here to Join the Great LX Weight-Off!
    Click here to Track the Progress!


    The leading authority on Anti-MTV ConsumerBotism.


    I'm a real estate agent let me know if i can help you!

  11. #11
    BrilliantBlackHemi's Avatar
    BrilliantBlackHemi is offline 05 Magnum RT and 10 Challenger
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Been here 7 years!
    Posts
    7,402
    Details details.

    Anyways, I've always heard you either want a Normally aspirated High Compression engine OR a lower compression supercharged or turboed engine. The higher compression negates what the supercharger and turbos do for you somewhat.
    Robert and Alice - Engaged 12/13/2008, NYC Central Park on "Gothic" footbridge

    R.I.P. Dad aka DynoBob

  12. #12
    RobAGD's Avatar
    RobAGD is offline See ya in anotha life brotha

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Reston, Va
    Posts
    13,910
    yea little brain fart going on there. I am still a little punchie from the drive lastnight.

    -R

  13. #13
    MomsR/T's Avatar
    MomsR/T is offline Builders of the 500rwhp 426's
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    5,341
    Quote Originally Posted by BrilliantBlackHemi
    Details details.

    Anyways, I've always heard you either want a Normally aspirated High Compression engine OR a lower compression supercharged or turboed engine. The higher compression negates what the supercharger and turbos do for you somewhat.
    No, not negate, rather will add a bit too much to handle in many cases.

    There are true race cars that are running 10:1 motors with 20 PSI turbos......but these are RACE CARS that could handle 14:1 - 15:1 mechanical.

    Remember, you can compress as much as you want..........the turbo or blower just puts more there to compress.

  14. #14
    DawsonMagnum's Avatar
    DawsonMagnum is offline Wielder of Mjolnir!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Duluth, GA
    Posts
    3,087
    Quote Originally Posted by RobAGD
    yea little brain fart going on there. I am still a little punchie from the drive lastnight.
    Understandable... But you still managed to clearly and concisely convey a somewhat esoteric concept of the internal combustion engine quite well. Better than I could have, for sure.
    Alis volat propiis.

    Glenn Harper - 2006 Brilliant Black Magnum SRT8
    Mods: FRI Fatman Cam, FRI Full Street Heads, Coated Intake Manifold, Coated Kooks LT Headers & hiflo Cats, B&G Stage II, Corsa Catback, 170 TStat. Various BT interior items & Custom Console Cover by Jina!

Share This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •