Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Twin Turbo 6.4 Challenger, Stock Bottom End!

  1. 06-28-2012, 09:53 AM #1
    EXTREME's Avatar
    EXTREME
    EXTREME is offline shopHEMI.com
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,086

    Twin Turbo 6.4 Challenger, Stock Bottom End!

    2011 Challenger 392 6spd - Wiring/Computer conversion and twin turbos at 6.5psi






























    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. 06-28-2012, 10:10 AM #2
    novawagonmaster's Avatar
    novawagonmaster
    novawagonmaster is online now The other white meat.
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ashtabula, Ohio
    Posts
    11,081
    I'm used to looking at N/A dyno sheets, so please excuse the questions...
    Is that graph typical of a TT application?
    Is the stock intake manifold choking airflow in the upper range?

    10.29@132 Aluminum 468 in '05 Magnum R/T
    Hemituner, Arrington, GTP, FTI, Paramount, Driveshaft Shop, LMI, and a few other goodies.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-28-2012, 10:11 AM #3
    Don@Arrington
    Don@Arrington is offline Nascar proven power
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Martinsville VA
    Posts
    1,833
    Not sure Jon...That`s going to be an AJ question

    Donnie 2 Strikes //
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-28-2012, 10:50 AM #4
    CT-MSRT's Avatar
    CT-MSRT
    CT-MSRT is offline Supporting Vendor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    8,786
    sick build. poor tranny.... Gotta love the torque of a TT setup though.

    Bone stock time: 12.832 @ 108.51 with a 2.033 60ft... On GY F1's Full Weight
    Predator and C&L Intake: 12.386 @ 111.78 1.868 60ft On GY F1's Full Weight
    Current mods: Hi-Flows, 180. Volant, PS Cooler, Trans Cooler, SS Brake Lines, Ti Backing Plates.
    Pedders Track II Extreme, Wavetrac, Moroso oil pan/catch can, 6.1 MTCM, Mopar trailer hitch.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-28-2012, 10:56 AM #5
    TanT's Avatar
    TanT
    TanT is offline <~Eat Me!
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Baton Rouge, La.
    Posts
    1,849
    Impressive at 6.5 PSI.
    Name is Kyle aka Dookie 2006->BB->Charger->SRT8->426->:-)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hemi31
    Told ya. .....
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadl0ck
    But it's not criminal to be an asshat.... Just not beneficial to you
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-28-2012, 11:10 AM #6
    EXTREME's Avatar
    EXTREME
    EXTREME is offline shopHEMI.com
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,086
    This setup doesn't have a boost controller because it's a low boost setup (5-7psi). Because of that it peaks boost as soon as you go WOT which makes the torque numbers look like that compared to the HP.
    Last edited by EXTREME; 06-28-2012 at 11:26 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-28-2012, 11:14 AM #7
    S. Artee's Avatar
    S. Artee
    S. Artee is online now Just the facts, sir...
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Lurking The Abyss
    Posts
    1,747




    I want one please!
    300c SRT-8 ~ 12.52@109mph
    (CAI, 180-stat, catback, 315s, FTI 3200, 91oct canned tune)

    Crossfire SRT-6 ~ 12.84@107mph
    (Bone Stock)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-28-2012, 05:47 PM #8
    Lowwlife's Avatar
    Lowwlife
    Lowwlife is offline World's First 200+ MPH Modern Mopar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SOCAL
    Posts
    462
    VERY Clean install guys...love it!!

    Congrats on your TT setup



    FONTANA..........1/15/12.......10.13@137
    TEXAS MILE......3/24/12.......200.9MPH
    MOJAVE MILE...9/29/12.......201.7MPH
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 07-07-2012, 03:19 PM #9
    daparrothead's Avatar
    daparrothead
    daparrothead is offline LX Padiwan
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dickinson, Texas
    Posts
    264
    Wow! Really nice numbers on a stock short block.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 07-07-2012, 03:35 PM #10
    CrazySRT8's Avatar
    CrazySRT8
    CrazySRT8 is offline Expecting Twins!!!!
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Orange, Ct and Boynton Beach, Fla
    Posts
    2,599
    Nice work, excellent numbers! any reason why you place the turbos under the car rather than in the bumper area, and requiring a pump for the oil? or, is the pump not that big of a deal???













    www.barberfirestop.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 07-07-2012, 03:51 PM #11
    Rollmodl's Avatar
    Rollmodl
    Rollmodl is offline Rollmodl
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Killeen
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by CrazySRT8 View Post
    Nice work, excellent numbers! any reason why you place the turbos under the car rather than in the bumper area, and requiring a pump for the oil? or, is the pump not that big of a deal???
    Not enough space for the turbos and intercooler. And probably heat too.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    2010 300S Stone white, dark tint, rear resonator delete 4 inch tips. Lots of little things
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 07-07-2012, 04:34 PM #12
    Tdola's Avatar
    Tdola
    Tdola is offline Done!!!!!!!
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    3,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Rollmodl View Post
    Not enough space for the turbos and intercooler. And probably heat too.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    I have to disagree. I have a 300 w/twin turbo's with less room up front then this car and it fits fine. Plus I have an external Oil Cooler, an External Tranny Cooler and an External Power Steering Cooler all mounted up front too. Plenty of room and no "Possible" oil pump failure...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 07-07-2012, 04:58 PM #13
    Rollmodl's Avatar
    Rollmodl
    Rollmodl is offline Rollmodl
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Killeen
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by Tdola View Post
    I have to disagree. I have a 300 w/twin turbo's with less room up front then this car and it fits fine. Plus I have an external Oil Cooler, an External Tranny Cooler and an External Power Steering Cooler all mounted up front too. Plenty of room and no "Possible" oil pump failure...
    Agree to disagree I guess cause I'm looking and dont see room behind the bumper cover and why would you put anything in front of an intercooler or radiator? It's less efficient.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 07-07-2012, 05:03 PM #14
    Rollmodl's Avatar
    Rollmodl
    Rollmodl is offline Rollmodl
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Killeen
    Posts
    294
    My car used to get hot and when I moved everything from in front of my radiator/intercooler to cooled everything.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 07-07-2012, 05:24 PM #15
    Tdola's Avatar
    Tdola
    Tdola is offline Done!!!!!!!
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    3,235
    It's not in front of it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Share This Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules