Mods Face Off Result: AirHammer Intake
This test consisted of testing the AirHammer Intake on a completely stock 2006 300C, an extensively modified 2005 300C, and a 2006 SRT8 Magnum at the Mods Face Off 5 (MFO5).
Mod Tested: AirHammer Intake by Hammer Motorsports
Date: 10/12/06 - 10/13/06
Dyno Location: SVS R&D, Sacramento CA
Track Location: Sacramento Raceway, Sacramento CA
***Remember to always review and keep in mind the Mods Face Off Testing Methodology Q&A while reviewing these results.***
The Good:
The Bad:
- For the first time in the history of the MFO events, we have a group of intakes that deliver significant performance increases on a stock 5.7L; and the AirHammer topped them all by producing average of 9.9hp and 8.8trq over the stock air box!
- The sound... oh my, the sound. Stand in front or to the side of this thing as it opens up at WOT and you're going to need to cover your ears. Far and away the loudest intake we tested
- Without a doubt, this was the fan favorite at the MFO5.
The Numbers:
- We consistently showed the large S&B filter out performed the small S&B filter; the large just won't fit on a Magnum or 300c (however it will fit on a Charger). All is not lost however, as S&B is working on a small filter with a 1" pleat... this filter will (not only fit the Magnum and 300C but) will actually have more surface area than the large filter we tested
- The sound... this intake WILL remind you its there every time you drive the car. This is not a subtle mod.
- Its still a prototype; not only does it look like it but its also not yet available for purchase.
The Graphs:
These two pulls closely follow the averages for the entire set. This is average vs average, not best vs best.
COMPARISONS:
Intake STP Horsepower Comparison - Stock 5.7L
Intake STP Torque Comparison - Stock 5.7L
Intake STP Horsepower Comparison - Modded 5.7
![]()
Intake STP Torque Comparison - Modded 5.7
Manometer readings:
The Pictures & Video:
AirHammer on Bruno's stock 300C
*******THIS VIDEO WAS FOR FUN ONLY!!! THE NUMBERS RESULTING FROM IT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE RESULTS ABOVE. THIS WAS JUST TO HAVE SOME FUN AND ENJOY THE ROAR!!!*******
My Personal Impression:
The numbers don't lie. The AirHammer is a very promising design, and its exciting to realize that OEMs are now starting to deliver on the promises that have been made for the last year, especially when it comes to a stock setup.
The AirHammer is not without its issues however. Looking down the barrel of the horn shows an approx 1/16" to 1/8" lip where the rolled steel meets the mandrel bent tube. I personally would like to see that lip removed, or at least minimized. Also, we showed that the small filter of the prototype really is a restriction as it brings the numbers right back to stock levels. The general consensus was that the small filter hamstrung the performance of the design. However, this issue should be removed when a 1" pleated filter is made available. Also, this is only a restriction on 300's and Magnums; the Chargers can support that large filter.
Using the manometer revealed some interesting facts as well. The stock box pulled right around 5.5" of water. The AirHammer, when combined with the large filter was far and away the leader in this category as it pulled 1.2" of water; net effect is an engine that basically is breathing much easier. That effect can be seen in the graph above as the torque and power curves are significantly steeper throughout the power curve (aka a harder pulling car).
Assuming a 1" pleated filter becomes available, and the AirHammer ships with it, this intake is a winner. Until then, and if I didn't have a Charger, I would wait.


1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



















...the next
Reply With Quote






And the dead shall walk 



Share This Thread